Ask the Editors: Assessing the Publishing Needs of Faculty Editors
نویسندگان
چکیده
Introduction: This article reports results from a survey of faculty members with editorial responsibilities. The explored what publishing services and platform functionalities respondents found most valuable in their work as editors, how satisfied they were the provided by commercial publishers, to extent aware alternative practices. Method: authors used data collected instrument that was distributed sample (n = 515) responsibilities at institution. Results: Collected suggest editors value specific (e.g., coordination peer review copyediting) functionality submission peer-review management) more than others, recognize several challenges facing academic disciplines (including transition open access models), are mostly common forms research dissemination such journals institutional repositories. Discussion: may be helpful library publishers making decisions about prioritize development programs. In addition utilizing assess needs also identified number expanded uses related marketing outreach. Conclusion: Insofar key stakeholders seek build partnerships with, it is important understand preferences editors. provides some insight into these questions prove publishers.
منابع مشابه
Editors note
EDITOR’S NOTE Geopersia is published biannually by the College of Science, University of Tehran, Iran. The College of Science published “Journal of Science”, which covered all fields of basic science, from 1968 to 2010. It was then decided that the College’s journals should be more specialized, and hence publication of Geopersia was launched. Geopersia aims to publish peer-reviewed original...
متن کاملFrom the Editors Publishing in Amj—part 2: Research Design
Most scholars, as part of their doctoral education, take a research methodology course in which they learn the basics of good research design, including that design should be driven by the questions being asked and that threats to validity should be avoided. For this reason, there is little novelty in our discussion of research design. Rather, we focus on common design issues that lead to rejec...
متن کاملFrom the Editors Publishing in Amj—part 1: Topic Choice
At the moment of this writing, there are 64 submissions in the hands of AMJ reviewers, who have been asked to critically evaluate the merits of those submissions relative to the mission and goals of the Journal. Although those reviewers will read their assigned manuscripts carefully and thoughtfully, their recommendations to the action editor will depend, in part, on a choice made years earlier...
متن کاملanalysis of reading comprehension needs of the students of paramedical studies: the case of the students of health information management (him)
چکیده ندارد.
15 صفحه اولAssessing the Quality of Wikipedia Editors through Crowdsourcing
In this paper, we propose a method for assessing the quality of Wikipedia editors. In the current editorial methods based on peer review, a text that survives beyond multiple edits is judged to be a good-quality text, and the editor of the text is judged to be a good-quality editor. However, the meaning of text does not always change if a term in the text is added or removed. Therefore, we cann...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication
سال: 2022
ISSN: ['2162-3309']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31274/jlsc.12912